<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for HeatherCellini.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heathercellini.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Corinne</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-21773</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-21773</guid>
		<description>http://www.fruitguyfans.com/  bio on each character :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fruitguyfans.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fruitguyfans.com/</a>  bio on each character <img src='http://www.heathercellini.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Suzie</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-21481</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-21481</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see the commerical where Apple gets a gift of a horse from a fan?  It only ran 1-2 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see the commerical where Apple gets a gift of a horse from a fan?  It only ran 1-2 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by cuerock</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20935</link>
		<dc:creator>cuerock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 03:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20935</guid>
		<description>they are currants....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are currants&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Mikey</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20934</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20934</guid>
		<description>Please excuse my girlfriend, it is either a wad of tobacco or a bud of good ol' Mary Jane. There now everyone can sleep at night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please excuse my girlfriend, it is either a wad of tobacco or a bud of good ol&#8217; Mary Jane. There now everyone can sleep at night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by MelodyLynn</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20933</link>
		<dc:creator>MelodyLynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20933</guid>
		<description>It's a shriveled up cotton plant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shriveled up cotton plant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Heather and Becky Sprinkel</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20379</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather and Becky Sprinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-20379</guid>
		<description>thank you for giving us the answers.  i had look up the fruit of the loom website first but still did not like that they said he was an autumn leaf.  why is he all wilted then?  i thought wilted lettuce.  but since seeing the tobacco leaves pic from above, that is a pretty convincing argument.  you would think he could be a prettier autumn leaf since they decided to make a costume out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for giving us the answers.  i had look up the fruit of the loom website first but still did not like that they said he was an autumn leaf.  why is he all wilted then?  i thought wilted lettuce.  but since seeing the tobacco leaves pic from above, that is a pretty convincing argument.  you would think he could be a prettier autumn leaf since they decided to make a costume out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Florence</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-19669</link>
		<dc:creator>Florence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-19669</guid>
		<description>I don't do much with my computer, but I was positive I could fing the answer.  Thank you. The question of the fourth "fruit" has been driving me nuts and no one wanted to speculate or debate this important question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t do much with my computer, but I was positive I could fing the answer.  Thank you. The question of the fourth &#8220;fruit&#8221; has been driving me nuts and no one wanted to speculate or debate this important question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Fruit Debate by Larry</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-19153</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/10/16/the-great-fruit-debate/#comment-19153</guid>
		<description>Well me and my wife just got into a huge debate about what the fruit guys are. She thought the green guy was spinach and that spinach is a fruit because it grows from the ground. She was really just saying stuff to my comment and didnt want to admit she was wrong because she confused the debate with a tomateo being a vegatable or a fruit because it has seeds!!!! Crazy women, thats why i love her. Anyway she then said the green guy was a fig leaf or a vine leaf from the grapes. Which makes no sense because the green grape is there and the purple grape is there. Why dont they bring in a tree for the apple? Well to bust all yall bubble the "green guy" is a leaf and the yellow mystery guy is a yellow gooseberry, the yellow guy is not confirmed but i know for sure the green guy is a leaf. www.thefruitguysfans.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well me and my wife just got into a huge debate about what the fruit guys are. She thought the green guy was spinach and that spinach is a fruit because it grows from the ground. She was really just saying stuff to my comment and didnt want to admit she was wrong because she confused the debate with a tomateo being a vegatable or a fruit because it has seeds!!!! Crazy women, thats why i love her. Anyway she then said the green guy was a fig leaf or a vine leaf from the grapes. Which makes no sense because the green grape is there and the purple grape is there. Why dont they bring in a tree for the apple? Well to bust all yall bubble the &#8220;green guy&#8221; is a leaf and the yellow mystery guy is a yellow gooseberry, the yellow guy is not confirmed but i know for sure the green guy is a leaf. <a href="http://www.thefruitguysfans.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefruitguysfans.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Cookies by Another Christian school teacher</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/03/02/jesus-cookies/#comment-14973</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Christian school teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/03/02/jesus-cookies/#comment-14973</guid>
		<description>Vigrond, I don't see any Christians "debating" here - I certainly haven't done anything of the sort anyway. But is Christians debating so bizarre anyway? We're still human; we're not robots programmed to think exactly the same way. I'm absolutely positive that if I witness or overhear a fellow Christian teach or preach something that is theologically or fundamentally flawed, I'm going to question it, but perhaps not so aggressively.

Anyway, my personal gripe here is that someone has decided to publically criticise an educational activity that is both creative and inspiring. Yes, it so happens that this activity is contextually Christian, but should that matter? Even if the "critisizer's" beliefs do not pertain to the Christian faith, it's still quite difficult to understand why this idea is "fucked up".

Fine, you're not Christian, and fine, you don't happen to like this idea - don't use it then! I certainly would not expect any non-Christian teacher to use this particular lesson, "To each their own" after all.

That's just the way the cookie crumbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vigrond, I don&#8217;t see any Christians &#8220;debating&#8221; here - I certainly haven&#8217;t done anything of the sort anyway. But is Christians debating so bizarre anyway? We&#8217;re still human; we&#8217;re not robots programmed to think exactly the same way. I&#8217;m absolutely positive that if I witness or overhear a fellow Christian teach or preach something that is theologically or fundamentally flawed, I&#8217;m going to question it, but perhaps not so aggressively.</p>
<p>Anyway, my personal gripe here is that someone has decided to publically criticise an educational activity that is both creative and inspiring. Yes, it so happens that this activity is contextually Christian, but should that matter? Even if the &#8220;critisizer&#8217;s&#8221; beliefs do not pertain to the Christian faith, it&#8217;s still quite difficult to understand why this idea is &#8220;fucked up&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fine, you&#8217;re not Christian, and fine, you don&#8217;t happen to like this idea - don&#8217;t use it then! I certainly would not expect any non-Christian teacher to use this particular lesson, &#8220;To each their own&#8221; after all.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the way the cookie crumbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus Cookies by Vigrond</title>
		<link>http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/03/02/jesus-cookies/#comment-14972</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigrond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathercellini.com/blog/archives/2003/03/02/jesus-cookies/#comment-14972</guid>
		<description>This is hilarius
Christians debating over a cookie recipe and how it shalt be learned from children!

hahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarius<br />
Christians debating over a cookie recipe and how it shalt be learned from children!</p>
<p>hahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
